“ If we are to learn existent peace in the universe we shall hold to get down with kids. ”
– Mahatma Gandhi ( Father of the Nation )
Peace, as an integrative position for the school course of study, is an thought whose clip has come. Education for peace acknowledges the end of advancing a civilization of peace as the intent determining the enterprise of instruction. Education for peace is instruction for life, and non simply developing for a support. Equiping persons with the values, accomplishments, and attitudes they need to be wholesome individuals who live in harmoniousness with others and as responsible citizens is the end of the instruction for peace. It is really necessary in a state like India as the state is full of diverseness whether it is faith, linguistic communication, rites, traditions, imposts. And there are incidents with in the state when the struggles between different spiritual communities or linguistic communications communities had arisen and took the signifier of force. Violence is an easy arm to respond to the jobs and today ‘s young person is going more and more familiar or used to of this “ unwanted arm ” . Children get all these values and attitudes from their experiences which they gained in the school or at place. So, there is an pressing demand for the instruction for peace so that the citizens of tomorrow can be empowered to take the manner of peace. Necessary accomplishments, values and attitudes required for the peace demand to be developed and inculcated in kids if we want to hold a safe and progressing hereafter for all of us.
The credence of instruction for peace as a necessary ingredient of holistic instruction was due to the rise and spread of force. Decade of 2000-2010 was declared as the international decennary for publicity of a civilization of peace and non-violence by the UNESCO. But Indian instruction committees have ever recommended instruction for peace in many signifiers, but these recommendations are non being applied even today. The study of the Secondary Education Commission ( 1952-53 ) stated that “ the supreme terminal of the educative procedure should be the preparation of the character and personality of pupils in such a manner that they will be able to recognize their full potencies and contribute to the wellbeing of the community ” . The Kothari instruction Commission ( 1964-66 ) put the limelight on the instruction and national development and said that “ absence of proviso for instruction in societal, moral and religious values is a serious defect in the course of study ” . The National Policy on Education ( 1986 ) advocated turning instruction into “ a forceful tool for the cultivation of societal and moral values ” . The programme of Action ( 1992 ) tried to incorporate the assorted constituents of value instruction into the course of study at the all phases of school instruction. National Curriculum Framework ( 2005 ) recommended that instruction in true sense should authorise persons to clear up their values ; to enable them to take witting and calculated determinations, taking into awareness the effects of their actions ; to take the manner of peace instead than force.
Therefore, our instruction system has ever followed instruction for peace but these enterprises remained mostly on the paper even today due to assorted grounds like deficiency of proper preparation of instructors in their function as peace builders ; course of study burden ; absence of right attitudes and patterns in the school ; improper pedagogical and rating patterns ; violent societal ambiance etc.
Needs and desires are the steering motive for worlds. If our demands are non fulfilled, so we are in a province of struggle which can non take to peaceable ways of life and on the other manus desires are ever limitless and therefore they besides lead to some signifier of force ( like aggression ) if unfulfilled. A celebrated psychologist Abraham Maslow ( 1968 ) identified human demands and stated that human demands move in a hierarchy ( fig. 1 ) . If the demands of one bed are non satisfied so the demands of other bed can non be fulfilled and fulfilment of these demands is necessary for set uping peace because instability in these demands can do struggles and aggression in worlds and these are the first grounds of force. In India, many people are still non able to carry through even their basic demands and offense, force, aggression, struggles, depressions ; self-destructions are consequence of it. So, in this scenario, instruction for peace becomes truly of import for all of us so that struggles and jobs can be resolved in peaceable ways.
We are societal animate beings, non self-contained islands. Autonomy, as Gandhi Jemaah Islamiyah pointed out, must non be mistaken for autonomy. We need each other. Mutuality is the human face of autonomy. How we respond and relate to others is a important component in our personalities. If this be the instance, instruction demands to foster in pupils the values and accomplishments that enable them to populate in harmoniousness with others. Jacques Delors ( 1996 ) identifies “ populating together in harmoniousness ” as one of the four pillars of instruction. The current pattern of instruction is unequal to advance the art of life together in harmoniousness. Students are nurtured in a spirit of competition and trained, from the beginning, to associate to facts and objects. Learning takes topographic point in a background isolated from the universe of relationships and worlds. Learning of this sort comprises, as Charles Dickens ( 2003 ) lamented in Hard Times, “ facts, facts and nil but facts ” .
Fig. 1, Hierarchical needs of human harmonizing to Maslow
Today ‘s society is based on the thought of net income and competition and these two things are easy reflected in our present educational system where classs and Markss matter more than anything else. Present instruction turns kids into intellectual machines that maestro facts and are mastered by them. Our instruction leaves the kids deficient in emotional and relational accomplishments. As a consequence, the more “ achievement-oriented ” a individual is less able he tends to be associating to people, even beloved 1s, sensitively, in return and responsibly. The disaffection between caput and bosom is the by-product of the current theoretical account of instruction.
Religion in force as a quick-fix job convergent thinker is an emerging moving ridge. This force can be seeable in the signifier of physical penalty or unseeable in the signifier of competition or craving for accomplishment. Agenda-wars in workplaces, gender-wars in places, propaganda wars in the public infinite, force is everyplace in one or the other signifier. We have got accustomed of force in many signifiers but fact is that we do n’t even acknowledge this and kids observe all these things and larn to follow their seniors. Peace begins with the person and spreads to the household, to the community, to the state and to the planetary small town.
Education for Peace:
We should guarantee that the instruction we impart is favourable to the well-being and integrity of India. Peace is a premier demand for advancement and national integrating. Implementing instruction for peace is non merely an appropriate scheme for struggle declaration and struggle turning away, but besides a practical plus in recognizing “ the India of our dreams ” . Every society in every age has acknowledged peace as a baronial and necessary ideal.
Education for peace can do larning a joyful and meaningful experience if implemented with energy and vision. In today ‘s universe, haste and worry sour the joy of acquisition and challenge acquisition and harmoniousness of life. Values acquire lost in this ambiance of competition. Valuess are internalized through experience, which is unhappily missing in the schoolroom centered and entirely cognitive attack to learning. Education for peace calls for the freedom of larning from the boundaries of the schoolroom and its transmutation into a jubilation of consciousness enlivened with the delectation of find. Education for peace contextualizes larning. We live in an age of unprecedented force: locally, nationally and globally. It is a serious affair that schools, which are meant to be the baby’s rooms of peace, go transmittal points for force. Education for peace seeks to foster the cognition, accomplishments, attitudes and values that comprise a civilization of peace. Education for peace is holistic. Education for peace has a double intent: ( a ) to authorise persons to take the way of peace instead than the way of force ; ( B ) to enabling them to be conciliators instead than consumers of peace.
An attack to Education for Peace:
The peace chances hidden in the course of study are maximized when the school ambiance is inspired with the values and attitudes of peace. Teacher-student interactions, lesson designs in text editions, the pedagogic attack and the entire life of school must all be oriented towards peace. The pedagogic scheme for instruction for peace is that of integrating. The incorporate attack has an border over the “ separate capable attack ” . Constructivist psychological science has established that kids construct cognition holistically. When cognition is rooted in suited contexts, it becomes more meaningful and gratifying for the scholar. In the incorporate attack, the lessons and subjects become the vehicles to convey peace messages in meaningful contexts. This attack non merely makes the capable affair wholesome and situated but besides motivates pupils to larn and to associate what they learn to their ain scenes. It provides contexts and connexions to research, believe, reflect, and internalise positive temperaments. Therefore, every instructor becomes a peace pedagogue. Teacher-student interactions, text edition lessons and the teaching method for learning them, and the school direction and administrative staff must all be oriented to education for peace.
ROLE OF TEACHERS IN EDUCATION FOR PEACE:
For pupils, instructors are role-models. Therefore, instructors play a function, unconsciously, in propagating force if they are non oriented to peace. As the expression goes, “ What I teach is what I know and what I educate is what I am. ” A instructor ‘s premier duty is to assist pupils go good human existences, motivated to carry through their true potency non merely for their ain benefit but besides for the improvement of the society as a whole. It is for this ground that a instructor is compared to a nurseryman who workss seeds of cognition and good values, Waterss them with attention and kindness, and removes weeds of ignorance. Good instructors are theoretical accounts of peace values, such as, the art of hearing, the humbleness to admit and rectify one ‘s errors, presuming duty for one ‘s actions, sharing concerns, and assisting each other to work out jobs exceeding differences, even if they do non recommend peace.
A instructor who imposes “ subject ” in the schoolroom merely by endangering kids with blows and smacks is a role-model for force as the lone problem-solving scheme. The instructor ‘s function in making a positive clime in the schoolroom is of critical importance. It is his/ her attitudes, values, and relationships that determine the nature of the schoolroom clime. A instructor who, from
a peace position, can critically measure his/her attitudes, accustomed manners of thought, and attack to teaching-what one Teachs and what are the carry-over values of what is taught and how it is taught-is an plus for instruction for peace.
“ Teachers are mirror of approaching coevalss in the signifier of pupils and an effectual component of set uping peaceable ambiance ” . The function of instructors towards a kid ‘s instruction is to make a lovingness environment in the schoolroom. Teachers who listen to what the pupils have to state and develop a course of study that is meaningful to the kids have the most successful pupils. Teachers with a concern for the demands of the pupils and a child-centered doctrine have concerted pupils who look frontward to larning.
Children close their ears to advice and open their eyes to illustration. This is particularly true in the Indian context where instructors are respected as the beginning of cognition and wisdom. Students will larn peace values merely if these are modeled by their instructors and seniors. If there is a mismatch between what grownups do and what they say, pupils will copy what is done. Teachers need to be cognizant of the consequence of their behavior on pupils. For illustration, alternatively of cheering pupils to “ care for others ” , it is more effectual to pattern this value and allow pupils build their ain apprehension of it.
Fig. 2, Role of Teachers in instruction for peace
The common pedagogic end for instructors is syllabus and scrutiny oriented. In peace-oriented teaching method, the focal point is non simply on keeping of constructs, memorisation of texts, or accomplishing single ends and excellence but on larning to reflect, portion, attention, and collaborate with each other. Every topic/lesson has peace- concealed constituents, which need to be communicated with purposeful be aftering from a positive and humanistic position. The methods of instruction should be originative, child-centered, largely experiential, and participatory. There is ample range in the course of study of assorted capable countries for learning pupils the importance of following peaceable agencies of deciding dissensions and struggles and avoiding force ; and instructors need to take full advantage of this.
Teaching should excite positive feelings and surrogate positive experiences, aid in geting at an apprehension of the ego, promote openness to inquiry by raising inquiries, researching, and detecting and building an apprehension of values, and supply an chance for using the cognition of values the pupil has learnt. Schemes like inquiries, narratives, anecdotes, games, experiments, treatments, duologues, value elucidation, illustrations, analogies, metaphors, role-play, and simulation are helpful in advancing peace through teaching-learning. In all of this, what stands out is the important function that the instructor plays in an attack to education that promotes a civilization of peace. The fact that larning has to needfully be pupil-oriented does non belie this. Learning can be pupil-oriented merely if the instructor facilitates it. For instruction for peace, a great trade depends on the peace-motivation of instructors, particularly in the incorporate attack. The instructor has to be watchful to peace chances and originative in allowing them in regard of the course of study as a whole.
Challenges in forepart of instruction for peace:
Education for peace brushs many jobs when integrated with in the instruction larning procedure. Curriculum burden is one of them. Curriculum burden has serious practical deductions for implementing instruction for peace. Completion of course of study Acts of the Apostless as the terminal merchandise itself and the intent of instruction get lost in this “ race ” . Second, rating patterns encourage competition and everyone wants to larn merely for first-class classs and Markss because these Markss make them eligible for higher paid and reputed employment chances. Third, teacher instruction does non fit the scholars with invention and imaginativeness and they were non even sensitized about their function as peace builders. Fourth day-to-day patterns of school do non reflect peace. Discrimination and unfairness are the signifier of force and schools are still perpetuating the favoritism which is based on gender and caste. Fifth the media is permeant presence today and kids observe and follow a batch from the ocular media. Most of the reactions of the young person today are greatly inspired by the movies. Sixth, societal force per unit area and competition to travel in front from others excessively challenge instruction for peace as everyone wants a speedy solution. Peoples do n’t hold faith in peaceable methods.
Fig. 3, Challenges for Education for peace
Therefore, instruction for peace is the necessity of today and schools should incorporate aspirations to peace and related values and accomplishments. It should be compulsory to guarantee that schools are free from prejudiced attitudes and patterns based on caste and gender. School instruction involves the formative old ages in a individual ‘s life, so child centered, integrated and constructivist pedagogical and appraising schemes should be adopted so that kids can research, inquire and larn to be the builders of cognition every bit good as of the peace. Teacher instruction demands to be transformed harmonizing to the demands and aspirations of present times because instructors can be societal therapists. Teachers must be equipped with the constructivist and incorporate attacks of the teaching-learning procedure. Education for peace demands to be seen as an endeavor for mending and regenerating the state as it can trip the holistic vision for instruction. In Indian context, instruction for peace is every bit responsible for the riddance of all signifiers of favoritism and inequality whether it is based on gender, caste or economical footing. Education for peace must be understood as the instruction for life every bit good as for the bright, progressive and peaceable hereafter.
Delors, J. ( 1996 ) . Learning the Treasure within: Report of International Commission on Education for the twenty-first Century. Paris: UNESCO.
Dewey, J. ( 1916 ) . Democracy and Education, London: The Free Press.
Government of India ( 1953 ) . Report of the Secondary Education Commission, ( 1952-53 ) . New Delhi: Ministry of Education, Government of India.
Government of India ( 1966 ) . Report of the Education Commission 1964-66 on “ Education and National Development ” . New Delhi: Ministry of Education, Government of India.
Government of India. ( 1986 ) . Report of the National Policy on Education ( 1986 ) . New Delhi, Ministry of Human Resources Development, Government of India.
Government of India ( 1993 ) . Learning without Burden. New Delhi: Ministry of Human Resources Development ( MHRD ) , Department of Education, Government of India.
Maslow, A. H. ( 1968 ) . Towards a Psychology of Being, 2e. New York: Van Nostrand Reinholf.
National Council of Educational Research and Training ( NCERT ) ( 2000 ) . National Curriculum Framework for School Education. New Delhi: NCERT.
National Curriculum Framework ( 2005 ) : New Delhi: National Council of Educational Research and Training.
Piaget, J. ( 1973 ) : To understand is to contrive ; New York: Grossman.
UNESCO ( 2001 ) . Learning the Way of Peace. A Teachers ‘ Guide to Education for Peace. New Delhi: UNESCO.
Woolfolk, A. ( 2007 ) : Educational Psychology ( 10th Edition ) ; Canada: Pearson Publishers.